WHAT DOES CASE LAW PROPERTY SALE ON SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MEAN?

What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?

What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?

Blog Article

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case regulation at both the federal and state levels.

How much sway case regulation holds might fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of the current case. To discover this concept, think about the following case regulation definition.

10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

The lots of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities topic to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-subject duties from the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the instant petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will consider care of all of the aspects of the case and be certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Just a couple years back, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming job, necessitating persons to search through print copies of case regulation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case law search prospects, and several sources offer free access to case regulation.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load supplied to any reported judgment could rely on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[seven]

A lot of judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with established legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report to the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is often a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law needs that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case get more info the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.

Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and also the case shall be decided because of the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more

ten. Based within the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition will not be regarded maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

Report this page